The Rosetta Stone Project. II. The correlation between star formation efficiency and L/M indicator for the evolutionary stages of star-forming clumps in post-processed radiative magnetohydrodynamics simulations
Ngo-Duy Tung, Alessio Traficante, Ugo Lebreuilly, Alice Nucara, Leonardo Testi, Patrick Hennebelle, Ralf S. Klessen, Sergio Molinari, Veli-Matti Pelkonen, Milena Benedettini, Alessandro Coletta, Davide Elia, Gary A. Fuller, Stefania Pezzuto, Juan D. Soler, Claudia Toci

TL;DR
This study uses radiative magnetohydrodynamics simulations and synthetic observations to calibrate the $L/M$ ratio as an indicator of star formation efficiency and evolutionary stage in massive star-forming clumps.
Contribution
It introduces the Rosetta Stone project framework for comparing simulations with observations and establishes a quantitative relation between $L/M$ and star formation efficiency.
Findings
$L/M$ correlates with star formation efficiency as a power law.
The $L/M$-$SFE$ relation is independent of clump mass and initial conditions.
Synthetic observations match observational techniques, validating the calibration.
Abstract
Context. The evolution of massive star-forming clumps that are progenitors of high-mass young stellar objects are often classified based on a variety of observational indicators ranging from near-infrared to radio wavelengths. Among them, the ratio of the bolometric luminosity to the mass of their envelope, , has been observationally diagnosed as a good indicator for the evolutionary classification of parsec-scale star-forming clumps in the Galaxy. Aims. We developed the Rosetta Stone projectan end-to-end framework designed to enable an accurate comparison between simulations and observations for investigating the formation and evolution of massive clumps. In this study, we calibrate the indicator in relation to the star formation efficiency (SFE) and the clump age, as derived from our suite of simulations. Methods. We performed multi-wavelength radiative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
