Response to "Are Hilbert Spaces Unphysical? Hardly, My Dear!''
Gabriele Carcassi, Robert Rozite, Christine A. Aidala

TL;DR
This paper defends the physical relevance of Hilbert spaces by clarifying the distinction between coordinate transformations and basis changes in quantum mechanics, countering recent criticisms.
Contribution
It clarifies the difference between coordinate transformations and basis changes, rebutting a recent critique of the unphysicality of Hilbert spaces.
Findings
Coordinate transformations can change expectation values.
Basis changes do not alter expectation values.
The critique conflates two distinct concepts.
Abstract
A recent criticism of our paper ``The unphysicality of Hilbert spaces'' by Nivaldo Lemos refutes our central argument that a state with finite expectation value can be mapped to a state with infinite expectation value by a coordinate transformation. By conflating coordinate transformation with change of basis in quantum mechanics, Lemos argues that expectation values are invariant under change of variables. In the present work, we clarify the distinction between coordinate transformation and change of basis, and rebut Lemos' main argument.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
