A New Approach for Multicriteria Assessment in the Ranking of Alternatives Using Cardinal and Ordinal Data
Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu, Su-Chuan Shih

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel multi-criteria assessment method combining two Virtual Gap Analysis models to improve the evaluation of alternatives using both quantitative and qualitative data, enhancing fairness and accuracy.
Contribution
The paper presents a new MCA approach that integrates two VGA models based on linear programming to better handle mixed data types and reduce subjective bias in decision-making.
Findings
Demonstrates improved evaluation accuracy through numerical examples
Ensures more comprehensive and fair assessments
Enhances transparency in decision-making processes
Abstract
Modern methods for multi-criteria assessment (MCA), such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), are utilized to appraise a collection of Decision-Making Units (DMUs), also known as alternatives, based on several criteria. These methodologies inherently rely on assumptions and can be influenced by subjective judgment to effectively tackle the complex evaluation challenges in various fields. In real-world scenarios, it is essential to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative criteria as they consist of cardinal and ordinal data. Despite the inherent variability in the criterion values of different alternatives, the homogeneity assumption is often employed, significantly affecting evaluations. To tackle these challenges and determine the most appropriate alternative, we propose a novel MCA approach that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making
