TL;DR
This paper introduces quantum algorithms for sparse convex optimization that significantly reduce query complexity and runtime compared to classical methods, applicable to vector and matrix domains with sparse and nuclear norm constraints.
Contribution
The paper presents novel quantum algorithms for projection-free sparse convex optimization, achieving improved query and time complexities over classical algorithms in both vector and matrix settings.
Findings
Quantum algorithms reduce query complexity by factors of up to O(√d) and O(d).
Quantum methods improve runtime for matrix nuclear norm constraints by factors of at least O(√d).
Algorithms outperform classical methods in high-dimensional sparse convex optimization tasks.
Abstract
This paper considers the projection-free sparse convex optimization problem for the vector domain and the matrix domain, which covers a large number of important applications in machine learning and data science. For the vector domain , we propose two quantum algorithms for sparse constraints that finds a -optimal solution with the query complexity of and by using the function value oracle, reducing a factor of and over the best classical algorithm, respectively, where is the dimension. For the matrix domain , we propose two quantum algorithms for nuclear norm constraints that improve the time complexity to and for computing the update step, reducing at least a…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
The paper provides an original approach towards solving constraint optimization problems. The significance of the result is diminished, as noted in weaknesses, but deficiencies in complexity analysis of the method and its assumptions. The paper is clearly written, although the assumptions should be more prominently analysed.
The main weakness involves unrealistic assumptions that affect the complexity of the full algorithm. For example, step 7 in Alg. 2 involves preparing, in each Frank-Wolfe iteration, a state $\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}|i>|x^{(t)}>|0>$, with $|x>$ defined in Assumption 3 to be $|x> = |x_1>|x_2>…|x_d>$. The state is over $d+2$ qubits. Similar qubit $O(d)$ qubit requirement is present in the rest of scenarios considered in the paper. This linear qubit requirement severely limits the applicability of the metho
The paper is well-written, featuring a clear presentation of the methods, the obtained complexity results, and comparisons with prior works.
My primary concern pertains to the paper's motivation. I find the core motivation insufficiently justified. The manuscript does not adequately establish a compelling need for specialized quantum algorithms for this particular class of problems. From my perspective, the proposed method appears somewhat ad-hoc, lacking both a clear demonstration of practical application and the provision of new, general insights for the field of quantum algorithm design.
- Originality: the authors study quantum acceleration for projection-free convex optimization for several classes of optimization problems. They propose some ways to achieve quantum acceleration under the FW framework, like quantum gradient estimation, singular value extraction, et.c. - Quality: They gave theoretical analysis of their methods, proving a worst case guarantee. - Clarity: The writing of the paper is good. Their problem formulations, algorithms and theoretical results are presente
The paper’s algorithmic advances rely heavily on existing quantum subroutines—such as quantum maximum finding, gradient estimation, and singular value extraction—raising questions about how much novelty lies beyond combining these tools within the Frank–Wolfe framework. The authors could better articulate what new technical challenges are overcome or what insights are unique to the projection-free setting. For example, what is the novelty of this work on vector variable problems compared with Ch
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
