Highly accurate simulations of asymmetric black-hole scattering and cross validation of effective-one-body models
Oliver Long, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Alessandra Buonanno, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Antoni Ramos-Buades, Hannes R. R\"uter, Lawrence E. Kidder, Mark A. Scheel

TL;DR
This paper presents 60 new high-precision numerical relativity simulations of black-hole scattering, compares them with various effective-one-body models, and highlights the first measurement of asymmetric gravitational-wave emission effects on scattering angles.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison of NR scattering angles across different codes and with EOB models, including the first measurement of asymmetry effects due to gravitational-wave emission.
Findings
NR simulations agree well across codes for scattering angles
EOB models generally match NR results within 8-5% depending on the model
Asymmetric gravitational-wave emission causes measurable differences in scattering angles
Abstract
The study of unbound binary-black-hole encounters provides a gauge-invariant approach to exploring strong-field gravitational interactions in two-body systems, which can subsequently inform waveform models for bound orbits. In this work, we present 60 new highly accurate numerical relativity (NR) simulations of black-hole scattering, generated using the Spectral Einstein Code (SpEC). Our simulations include 14 spin-aligned configurations, as well as 16 configurations with unequal masses, up to a mass ratio of 10. We perform the first direct comparison of scattering angles computed using different NR codes, finding good agreement. We compare our NR scattering angle results to the post-Minkowskian (PM)-based effective-one-body (EOB) closed-form models SEOB-PM and , finding less than 5% deviation except near the scatter-capture separatrix. Comparisons with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
