The State of Computational Science in Fission and Fusion Energy
Andrea Morales Coto, Aditi Verma

TL;DR
This paper surveys the current state of computational tools in fusion and fission energy engineering, highlighting a shift towards modern, open-source, and modular software, with implications for future nuclear engineering practices.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive survey of computational scientists in nuclear energy, revealing trends towards modern programming languages, open-source codes, and increased modularity in software tools.
Findings
Growing preference for Python and C++ over FORTRAN
Increase in open-source and modular software usage
Rising budgets for code development, up to $50M
Abstract
The tools used to engineer something are just as important as the thing that is actually being engineered. In fact, in many cases, the tools can indeed determine what is engineerable. In fusion and fission1 energy engineering, software has become the dominant tool for design. For that reason, in 2024, for the first time ever, we asked 103 computational scientists developing the codes used in fusion and fission energy about the problems they are attempting to solve with their codes, the tools available to them to solve them, and their end to end developer experience with said tools. The results revealed a changing tide in software tools in fusion and fission, with more and more computational scientists preferring modern programming languages, open-source codes, and modular software. These trends represent a peek into what will happen 5 to 10 years in the future of nuclear engineering.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
