Better Together: Quantifying the Benefits of AI-Assisted Recruitment
Ada Aka, Emil Palikot, Ali Ansari, and Nima Yazdani

TL;DR
This study empirically evaluates AI-assisted recruitment's impact on hiring efficiency and candidate outcomes, revealing increased selection rates and employment prospects, while analyzing selection biases and decision-making processes.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale randomized controlled trial quantifying AI's effects on recruitment efficiency and candidate success, including analysis of selection criteria and biases.
Findings
AI increased final interview pass rate from 34% to 54%.
Candidates from the AI group had a higher likelihood of finding new jobs.
AI tended to select younger, less experienced applicants.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in recruitment, yet empirical evidence quantifying its impact on hiring efficiency and candidate selection remains limited. We randomly assign 37,000 applicants for a junior-developer position to either a traditional recruitment process (resume screening followed by human selection) or an AI-assisted recruitment pipeline incorporating an initial AI-driven structured video interview before human evaluation. Candidates advancing from either track faced the same final-stage human interview, with interviewers blind to the earlier selection method. In the AI-assisted pipeline, 54% of candidates passed the final interview compared with 34% from the traditional pipeline, yielding an average treatment effect of 20 percentage points (SE 12 pp.). Five months later, we collected LinkedIn profiles of top applicants from both groups and found that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
