Plausible Counterfactual Explanations of Recommendations
Jakub \v{C}ern\'y, Ji\v{r}\'i N\v{e}me\v{c}ek, Ivan Dovica, Jakub Mare\v{c}ek

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for generating highly plausible counterfactual explanations in recommender systems, enhancing transparency and user trust, validated through numerical analysis and user studies.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel approach for producing plausible counterfactual explanations specifically tailored for recommender systems, addressing a gap in explanation quality.
Findings
The method produces highly plausible counterfactual explanations.
Numerical evaluations show improved explanation plausibility.
User studies confirm increased user trust and understanding.
Abstract
Explanations play a variety of roles in various recommender systems, from a legally mandated afterthought, through an integral element of user experience, to a key to persuasiveness. A natural and useful form of an explanation is the Counterfactual Explanation (CE). We present a method for generating highly plausible CEs in recommender systems and evaluate it both numerically and with a user study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Recommender Systems and Techniques · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
