Not All Preferences are What You Need for Post-Training: Selective Alignment Strategy for Preference Optimization
Zhijin Dong

TL;DR
This paper proposes a selective token alignment method for preference optimization in large language models, improving efficiency and effectiveness by focusing on high-impact tokens during post-training alignment.
Contribution
It introduces a token-level selective alignment strategy that leverages token importance and reference model quality to enhance preference alignment in LLMs.
Findings
Selective alignment reduces computational overhead.
Stronger reference models improve token selection accuracy.
Our method outperforms standard DPO and distillation baselines.
Abstract
Post-training alignment of large language models (LLMs) is a critical challenge, as not all tokens contribute equally to model performance. This paper introduces a selective alignment strategy that prioritizes high-impact tokens within preference pairs, leveraging token-level log-probability differences between the current policy and a reference model. By focusing on these informative tokens, our approach reduces computational overhead and enhances alignment fidelity. We further explore the role of reference model quality, demonstrating that stronger reference models significantly improve token selection accuracy and overall optimization effectiveness. Comprehensive experiments on benchmarks such as Arena-Hard and MT-Bench validate the superiority of our Selective-DPO method over standard DPO and distillation-based baselines. Our findings highlight the importance of token-level…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Topic Modeling · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
