Multilayer GNN for Predictive Maintenance and Clustering in Power Grids

TL;DR

This paper presents a multilayer Graph Neural Network framework that improves predictive maintenance and clustering in power grids by capturing spatial, temporal, and causal dependencies, leading to better failure prediction and risk segmentation.

Contribution

The study introduces a novel multilayer GNN architecture combining attention, convolution, and isomorphism networks for enhanced power grid failure prediction and clustering.

Findings

Achieves a 30-day F1-score of 0.8935, outperforming traditional models.

Removing the causal layer reduces performance significantly.

Clustering identifies eight risk groups with distinct incident and recovery profiles.

Abstract

Unplanned power outages cost the US economy over $150 billion annually, partly due to predictive maintenance (PdM) models that overlook spatial, temporal, and causal dependencies in grid failures. This study introduces a multilayer Graph Neural Network (GNN) framework to enhance PdM and enable resilience-based substation clustering. Using seven years of incident data from Oklahoma Gas & Electric (292,830 records across 347 substations), the framework integrates Graph Attention Networks (spatial), Graph Convolutional Networks (temporal), and Graph Isomorphism Networks (causal), fused through attention-weighted embeddings. Our model achieves a 30-day F1-score of 0.8935 +/- 0.0258, outperforming XGBoost and Random Forest by 3.2% and 2.7%, and single-layer GNNs by 10 to 15 percent. Removing the causal layer drops performance to 0.7354 +/- 0.0418. For resilience analysis, HDBSCAN clustering on HierarchicalRiskGNN embeddings identifies eight operational risk groups. The highest-risk cluster (Cluster 5, 44 substations) shows 388.4 incidents/year and 602.6-minute recovery time, while low-risk groups report fewer than 62 incidents/year. ANOVA (p < 0.0001) confirms significant inter-cluster separation. Our clustering outperforms K-Means and Spectral Clustering with a Silhouette Score of 0.626 and Davies-Bouldin index of 0.527. This work supports proactive grid management through improved failure prediction and risk-aware substation clustering.