Exploring Cosmic Dawn with PANORAMIC I: The Bright End of the UVLF at $z\sim9 -17$

TL;DR

This study uses JWST data combined with the PANORAMIC survey to constrain the bright end of the UV luminosity function at redshifts 10 to 17, revealing rapid evolution and setting new upper limits on galaxy abundance in the early universe.

Contribution

It provides new constraints on the bright end of the UVLF at high redshifts using combined survey data, improving understanding of galaxy evolution during cosmic dawn.

Findings

UVLF at z~10 consistent with previous results

High abundance of bright galaxies at z~10 confirmed

No robust candidates at z~17, indicating rapid evolution

Abstract

In its first two years of operation, the James Webb Space Telescope has enabled the discovery of a surprising number of UV-bright galaxies at $z\sim10-14$. Their number density is still relatively uncertain, due to cosmic variance effects, and the limited survey area with deep imaging. Here, we combine pure parallel imaging from the PANORAMIC survey with data from legacy fields to constrain the bright end (M$_{\rm UV}<-18.5$) of the UV luminosity function (UVLF) over $0.28\,$deg$^2$ of NIRCam imaging in 6 or more filters, and along 35 independent lines of sight. Using conservative color selections, we compile robust dropout samples at $z\sim10$, $z\sim13$, and $z\sim17$, and identify 16 new candidates from PANORAMIC. Our inferred UVLFs at $z\sim10$ are consistent with literature results and we confirm the high abundance of galaxies at the bright end (M$_{\rm UV}\lesssim-21$) with better number statistics. We find somewhat lower number densities at $z\sim13$ compared to previous studies, and no robust candidates at $z\sim17$, indicating a rapid evolution of the galaxy population from $z\sim10-17$. The improved upper limits at $z\sim17$ imply that the cosmic UV luminosity density drops by at least a factor $\sim50$ from $z\sim10$ to $z\sim17$. Comparing our results to models proposed to explain the abundance of UV-bright galaxies at $z\gtrsim10$, we conclude that a modest increase in the star formation efficiency, or in the burstiness of star formation, a more top-heavy initial mass function, a lack of dust attenuation, or a combination of these effects at $z\gtrsim10$, is sufficient to match our observational constraints.