Magnetic White Dwarfs in the SDSS 100 pc Sample: Further Evidence of Two Formation Channels

TL;DR

This study analyzes magnetic white dwarfs in the SDSS 100 pc sample, revealing two distinct populations formed through different mechanisms, with implications for understanding their origins and magnetic field development.

Contribution

It provides the largest volume-limited survey of magnetic white dwarfs and identifies two populations with distinct properties, supporting dual formation channels.

Findings

Two populations with different ages, masses, and magnetic fields.

Strong correlation between magnetism and crystallization onset.

Older, average-mass objects likely formed magnetic fields via a core dynamo.

Abstract

We conduct a model atmosphere analysis on all magnetic white dwarfs in the SDSS 100 pc sample. We have 163 magnetic targets in this sample, 87 of which are new discoveries, making this the largest volume-limited survey of magnetic white dwarfs to date. We discuss the distribution of multiple parameters, including mass, cooling age, and field strength. We find strong evidence of two populations of magnetic white dwarfs that form through separate mechanisms based on a cluster analysis of these parameters. The young, high mass objects typically have high field strengths which indicate a merger origin, while old, average mass objects have weaker fields that likely originated through a crystallization-induced dynamo or previous evolution stages. When comparing young and old objects, two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests yield statistically significant differences between the field strengths and masses of the magnetic targets. We use a Gaussian mixture model to identify where these populations lie in parameter space, and we find two groups centered at distinct cooling ages, masses, and field strengths: 2.9 Gyr, 0.71 $M_{\odot}$, 3.7 MG and 1.8 Gyr, 0.96 $M_{\odot}$, 84 MG respectively. Our results further support the dual formation channel previously reported in the literature. The occurrence of magnetism strongly correlates with the onset of crystallization. However, given the breakout times required for a crystallization dynamo, we find that many of our older, average mass objects can be better explained with a core-convective dynamo that forms on the main-sequence.