Beyond Manual Annotation: A Human-AI Collaborative Framework for Medical Image Segmentation Using Only "Better or Worse" Expert Feedback
Yizhe Zhang

TL;DR
This paper presents a human-AI collaborative framework for medical image segmentation that reduces manual labeling by using only binary better-or-worse feedback from experts, enabling efficient training of segmentation models.
Contribution
It introduces a preference learning paradigm and a multi-component framework that leverages minimal expert feedback to train segmentation models without explicit manual annotations.
Findings
Achieves competitive segmentation performance with minimal feedback.
Eliminates the need for manual pixel-level annotations.
Demonstrates effectiveness on multiple public datasets.
Abstract
Manual annotation of medical images is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process, posing a significant bottleneck in the development and deployment of robust medical imaging AI systems. This paper introduces a novel hands-free Human-AI collaborative framework for medical image segmentation that substantially reduces the annotation burden by eliminating the need for explicit manual pixel-level labeling. The core innovation lies in a preference learning paradigm, where human experts provide minimal, intuitive feedback -- simply indicating whether an AI-generated segmentation is better or worse than a previous version. The framework comprises four key components: (1) an adaptable foundation model (FM) for feature extraction, (2) label propagation based on feature similarity, (3) a clicking agent that learns from human better-or-worse feedback to decide where to click and with which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
