Towards Measurement Theory for Artificial Intelligence
Elija Perrier

TL;DR
This paper advocates for developing a formal measurement theory for AI to enable better comparison, evaluation, and understanding of AI capabilities through standardized and quantifiable metrics.
Contribution
It proposes a layered measurement framework and distinguishes observables to create a unified, calibratable taxonomy of AI phenomena.
Findings
Outlines a layered measurement stack for AI evaluation
Distinguishes direct and indirect observables in AI measurement
Suggests integrating AI evaluation with safety science techniques
Abstract
We motivate and outline a programme for a formal theory of measurement of artificial intelligence. We argue that formalising measurement for AI will allow researchers, practitioners, and regulators to: (i) make comparisons between systems and the evaluation methods applied to them; (ii) connect frontier AI evaluations with established quantitative risk analysis techniques drawn from engineering and safety science; and (iii) foreground how what counts as AI capability is contingent upon the measurement operations and scales we elect to use. We sketch a layered measurement stack, distinguish direct from indirect observables, and signpost how these ingredients provide a pathway toward a unified, calibratable taxonomy of AI phenomena.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
