Layered, Overlapping, and Inconsistent: A Large-Scale Analysis of the Multiple Privacy Policies and Controls of U.S. Banks
Lu Xian, Van Tran, Lauren Lee, Meera Kumar, Yichen Zhang, Florian Schaub

TL;DR
This large-scale analysis reveals significant inconsistencies in U.S. banks' privacy policies regarding third-party data sharing, raising concerns about transparency and consumer understanding under current legal frameworks.
Contribution
The study provides a comprehensive analysis of privacy policy inconsistencies among major U.S. banks, highlighting gaps between disclosures and actual practices.
Findings
53.8% of banks with multiple policies show inconsistencies
Many banks disclose no third-party sharing in GLBA notices but do so elsewhere
Inconsistencies may undermine transparency and consumer trust
Abstract
Privacy policies are often complex. An exception is the two-page standardized notice that U.S. financial institutions must provide under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA). However, banks now operate websites, mobile apps, and other services that involve complex data sharing practices that require additional privacy notices and do-not-sell opt-outs. We conducted a large-scale analysis of how U.S. banks implement privacy policies and controls in response to GLBA; other federal privacy policy requirements; and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), a key example for U.S. state privacy laws. We focused on the disclosure and control of a set of especially privacy-invasive practices: third-party data sharing for marketing-related purposes. We collected privacy policies for the 2,067 largest U.S. banks, 45.2\% of which provided multiple policies. Across disclosures and controls for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
