Pseudo-likelihood produces associative memories able to generalize, even for asymmetric couplings
Francesco D'Amico, Dario Bocchi, Luca Maria Del Bono, Saverio Rossi, Matteo Negri

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that networks trained with pseudo-likelihood in energy-based models can serve as associative memories that not only memorize training patterns but also generalize to new, structured data, even with asymmetric couplings.
Contribution
It shows that pseudo-likelihood training naturally leads to associative memories capable of generalization beyond classical models, with theoretical and empirical validation across diverse datasets.
Findings
Patterns become fixed-point attractors with large basins for small training sets.
Networks develop meaningful, correlated attractors as training data increases.
Pseudo-likelihood enables both efficient inference and robust memory and generalization.
Abstract
Energy-based probabilistic models learned by maximizing the likelihood of the data are limited by the intractability of the partition function. A widely used workaround is to maximize the pseudo-likelihood, which replaces the global normalization with tractable local normalizations. Here we show that, in the zero-temperature limit, a network trained to maximize pseudo-likelihood naturally implements an associative memory: if the training set is small, patterns become fixed-point attractors whose basins of attraction exceed those of any classical Hopfield rule. We explain quantitatively this effect on uncorrelated random patterns. Moreover, we show that, for different structured datasets coming from computer science (random feature model, MNIST), physics (spin glasses) and biology (proteins), as the number of training examples increases the learned network goes beyond memorization,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
