Practical considerations for Gaussian Process modeling for causal inference quasi-experimental studies with panel data
Sofia L. Vega, Rachel C. Nethery

TL;DR
This paper explores the use of Gaussian Processes for causal inference in panel data, providing a practical framework that enhances interpretability and flexibility in adjusting for complex spatio-temporal confounding.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive, interpretable GP-based approach for causal inference in panel data, generalizing existing methods and guiding kernel selection for better estimation.
Findings
GP posterior mean as a weighted average of outcomes
Kernel choice impacts estimation accuracy and interpretability
Application to Hurricane Katrina data demonstrates effectiveness
Abstract
Estimating causal effects in quasi-experiments with spatio-temporal panel data often requires adjusting for unmeasured confounding that varies across space and time. Gaussian Processes (GPs) offer a flexible, nonparametric modeling approach that can account for such complex dependencies through carefully chosen covariance kernels. In this paper, we provide a practical and interpretable framework for applying GPs to causal inference in panel data settings. We demonstrate how GPs generalize popular methods such as synthetic control and vertical regression, and we show that the GP posterior mean can be represented as a weighted average of observed outcomes, where the weights reflect spatial and temporal similarity. To support applied use, we explore how different kernel choices impact both estimation performance and interpretability, offering guidance for selecting between separable and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
