Harnessing Pairwise Ranking Prompting Through Sample-Efficient Ranking Distillation
Junru Wu, Le Yan, Zhen Qin, Honglei Zhuang, Paul Suganthan G. C., Tianqi Liu, Zhe Dong, Xuanhui Wang, Harrie Oosterhuis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a pairwise ranking distillation method that efficiently mimics the performance of Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) with significantly reduced computational costs, making high-quality document ranking more practical.
Contribution
The authors propose a novel distillation approach that transfers PRP's effectiveness to a pointwise student model, achieving similar performance with only 2% of the pairwise data.
Findings
The distilled student model matches PRP performance using only 2% of pairs.
The approach reduces computational costs during training and inference.
Sample-efficient distillation retains ranking quality with minimal data.
Abstract
While Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) with Large Language Models (LLMs) is one of the most effective zero-shot document ranking methods, it has a quadratic computational complexity with respect to the number of documents to be ranked, as it requires an enumeration over all possible document pairs. Consequently, the outstanding ranking performance of PRP has remained unreachable for most real-world ranking applications. In this work, we propose to harness the effectiveness of PRP through pairwise distillation. Specifically, we distill a pointwise student ranker from pairwise teacher labels generated by PRP, resulting in an efficient student model that retains the performance of PRP with substantially lower computational costs. Furthermore, we find that the distillation process can be made sample-efficient: with only 2% of pairs, we are able to obtain the same performance as using all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
