On commensurators of free groups and free pro-p groups
Yiftach Barnea, Mikhail Ershov, Adrien Le Boudec, Colin D. Reid, Matteo Vannacci, Thomas Weigel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the structure of commensurators of free groups and free pro-$p$ groups, revealing differences in simplicity properties and dependencies on rank, and constructs new simple groups within these frameworks.
Contribution
It proves that the commensurator of a non-abelian free group is not virtually simple, introduces simple subgroups of the p-commensurator, and shows the isomorphism class of the p-commensurator depends on the rank.
Findings
Comm(F) is not virtually simple.
Some subgroups of Comm(F) are simple.
Comm_p(F) has a simple subgroup of index at most 2.
Abstract
We study the commensurators of free groups and free pro- groups, as well as certain subgroups of these. We prove that the commensurator of a non-abelian free group of finite rank is not virtually simple, answering a question of Lubotzky. On the other hand, we exhibit a family of easy-to-define finitely generated subgroups of and show that some groups in this family are simple. For a prime , we also consider the p-commensurator , which is the commensurator of viewed as a group with pro- topology. By contrast with , we prove that has a simple subgroup of index at most 2. Further, while the isomorphism class of does not depend on the rank of , we prove that the isomorphism class of depends on the rank of and determine the exact dependency. If is the pro- completion of …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
