High Temperature Superconductivity Dominated by Inner Underdoped CuO$_2$ Planes in Quadruple-Layer Cuprate (Cu,C)Ba$_2$Ca$_3$Cu$_4$O$_{11+\delta}$
Xingtian Sun, Suppanut Sangphet, Nan Guo, Yu Fan, Yutong Chen, Minyinan Lei, Xue Ming, Xiyu Zhu, Hai-Hu Wen, Haichao Xu, Rui Peng, Donglai Feng

TL;DR
This study reveals that in quadruple-layer cuprates, high-temperature superconductivity is primarily driven by underdoped inner CuO$_2$ planes, challenging the traditional composite picture and showing superconductivity can occur without apical oxygen at high doping levels.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that high $T_c$ in multilayer cuprates originates from underdoped inner planes, not outer planes, and that apical oxygen-free CuO$_2$ planes can support high-temperature superconductivity.
Findings
Superconductivity mainly arises from underdoped inner CuO$_2$ planes.
Outer planes are not superconducting at $T_c$.
CuO$_2$ planes without apical oxygen support superconductivity up to 110 K.
Abstract
The superconducting transition temperature () of trilayer or quadruple-layer cuprates typically surpasses that of single-layer or bilayer systems. This observation is often interpreted within the ``composite picture", where strong proximity effect between inner CuO planes (IPs) and outer CuO planes (OPs) is crucial. Albeit intriguing, a straightforward scrutinization of this composite picture is still lacking. In this study, using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy to investigate (Cu,C)BaCaCuO (CuC-1234) with a high of 110~K, we found that the OPs are not superconducting at the of the material. Instead, the large pairing strength and phase coherence concurrently emerge at the underdoped IPs, suggesting that the high is primarily driven by these underdoped IPs. Given that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
