Determination of Particle-Size Distributions from Light-Scattering Measurement Using Constrained Gaussian Process Regression
Fahime Seyedheydari, Mahdi Nasiri, Marcin Mi\'nkowski, Simo S\"arkk\"a

TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust, constrained Gaussian process regression method for accurately estimating particle size distributions from optical scattering data, effectively addressing the ill-posed inverse problem with improved stability and physical interpretability.
Contribution
The work presents a novel constrained Gaussian process framework with spectral kernel expansion for stable, efficient particle size distribution estimation from scattering measurements, incorporating physical constraints.
Findings
Accurately reconstructs particle size distributions from noisy data.
Produces stable, smooth, and physically interpretable results.
Enhances computational efficiency with spectral kernel expansion.
Abstract
In this work, we propose a novel methodology for robustly estimating particle size distributions from optical scattering measurements using constrained Gaussian process regression. The estimation of particle size distributions is commonly formulated as a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind, an ill-posed inverse problem characterized by instability due to measurement noise and limited data. To address this, we use a Gaussian process prior to regularize the solution and integrate a normalization constraint into the Gaussian process via two approaches: by constraining the Gaussian process using a pseudo-measurement and by using Lagrange multipliers in the equivalent optimization problem. To improve computational efficiency, we employ a spectral expansion of the covariance kernel using eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator, resulting in a computationally tractable low-rank…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
