When Network Architecture Meets Physics: Deep Operator Learning for Coupled Multiphysics
Kazuma Kobayashi, Jaewan Park, Qibang Liu, Seid Koric, Diab Abueidda, Syed Bahauddin Alam

TL;DR
This paper investigates how neural network architecture should reflect physical coupling strength in multiphysics problems, demonstrating that architecture-aware DeepONets excel in strongly coupled systems and enable rapid, accurate surrogate modeling.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic evaluation of DeepONet variants across different physical coupling regimes, highlighting the importance of architecture alignment with physical interactions.
Findings
Single-branch DeepONets outperform multi-branch in strongly coupled systems.
Multi-branch architectures are advantageous for decoupled problems.
Surrogate models run up to 18,000 times faster than finite-element solvers.
Abstract
Scientific applications increasingly demand real-time surrogate models that can capture the behavior of strongly coupled multiphysics systems driven by multiple input functions, such as in thermo-mechanical and electro-thermal processes. While neural operator frameworks, such as Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets), have shown considerable success in single-physics settings, their extension to multiphysics problems remains poorly understood. In particular, the challenge of learning nonlinear interactions between tightly coupled physical fields has received little systematic attention. This study addresses a foundational question: should the architectural design of a neural operator reflect the strength of physical coupling it aims to model? To answer this, we present the first comprehensive, architecture-aware evaluation of DeepONet variants across three regimes: single-physics, weakly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
