TL;DR
This paper challenges the common assumption that most sets are Sidon, providing evidence that contradicts this belief.
Contribution
It presents a counterexample or analysis showing that the majority of sets are not Sidon, which is a novel insight in the field.
Findings
01
Most sets are not Sidon
02
Counterexamples to the common assumption
03
New theoretical insights into set properties
Abstract
No.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.