TL;DR
This paper evaluates large language models' understanding of Korean sentence endings using the new KoSEnd dataset, revealing how explicit linguistic cues can enhance model performance on complex agglutinative language features.
Contribution
Introduces the KoSEnd dataset for evaluating LLMs on Korean sentence endings and analyzes the impact of explicit linguistic information on model performance.
Findings
Models perform better when informed about missing sentence endings.
Parameter count correlates with prediction consistency.
Explicit linguistic cues improve LLM understanding of Korean syntax.
Abstract
Although LLMs have made significant progress in various languages, there are still concerns about their effectiveness with low-resource agglutinative languages compared to languages such as English. In this study, we focused on Korean, a language known for its complex sentence endings, and evaluated LLMs on this challenging aspect. We introduce the Korean Sentence Endings (KoSEnd) dataset, which includes 3,000 sentences, each annotated for the naturalness of 15 sentence ending forms. These were collected from diverse sources to cover a range of contexts. We evaluated 11 LLMs to assess their understanding of Korean sentence endings, analyzing them based on parameter count and prediction consistency. Notably, we found that informing models about the possibility of missing sentence endings improved performance, highlighting the impact of explicitly considering certain linguistic features.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
