A mechanism-independent methodology for modeling {\gamma}-ray phaseograms of pulsars in the framework of north-south symmetry
Paul K. H. Yeung, Dmitry Khangulyan, Takayuki Saito

TL;DR
This paper introduces a geometry-based, mechanism-independent model to analyze gamma-ray pulsar phaseograms, exploring the existence of additional emission components and their relation to observed polarization and wind models.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, assumption-free toy model incorporating north-south symmetry, Doppler effects, and energy-dependent beam shapes to interpret pulsar gamma-ray phaseograms.
Findings
Preliminary fit results align with wind emission models.
Crab pulsar's gamma-ray polarization correlates with model predictions.
Geminga's gamma-ray emission spans the entire phase.
Abstract
Fermi-LAT observations revealed that each GeV phase-folded light-curve (aka. phaseogram) of the Crab, Geminga, Dragonfly and Vela pulsars consists of two pulses (P1 & P2) and a "Bridge" between them. There is clearly a "bump" at the Bridge phase of Vela's pulse profiles, that could also be regarded as the third pulse (P3). Differently, the Crab's, Geminga's & Dragonfly's Bridges relatively resemble a "valley floor". Despite such an apparent difference, it is interesting to investigate whether their Bridge emissions are still within the same general picture as Vela's. Assuming the north-south symmetry, we would expect the fourth component (Bridge2/P4) to exist as well. However, such a hypothetical Bridge2/P4 is not intuitively identified on -ray phaseograms of the Crab, Geminga, Dragonfly and Vela pulsars. It is also intriguing to hint at the rationale for the non-discovery of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
