From Measurement to Mitigation: Exploring the Transferability of Debiasing Approaches to Gender Bias in Maltese Language Models
Melanie Galea, Claudia Borg

TL;DR
This paper evaluates gender bias in Maltese language models, adapting English bias mitigation techniques to a low-resource, morphologically rich language, and highlights the challenges and need for more inclusive NLP approaches.
Contribution
It adapts and assesses existing bias mitigation methods for Maltese LLMs, creating evaluation datasets and analyzing transferability challenges in low-resource languages.
Findings
Existing bias mitigation methods face challenges in Maltese due to linguistic complexity.
Adapting English bias techniques to Maltese requires significant modifications.
Highlighting the need for language-specific bias mitigation strategies.
Abstract
The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed Natural Language Processing (NLP), enabling performance across diverse tasks with little task-specific training. However, LLMs remain susceptible to social biases, particularly reflecting harmful stereotypes from training data, which can disproportionately affect marginalised communities. We measure gender bias in Maltese LMs, arguing that such bias is harmful as it reinforces societal stereotypes and fails to account for gender diversity, which is especially problematic in gendered, low-resource languages. While bias evaluation and mitigation efforts have progressed for English-centric models, research on low-resourced and morphologically rich languages remains limited. This research investigates the transferability of debiasing methods to Maltese language models, focusing on BERTu and mBERTu, BERT-based monolingual and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
