On the origin of the X-ray emission surrounding PSR B0656+14 in the eROSITA Cal-PV data
Alena Khokhriakova, Werner Becker, Peter Predehl, Jeremy S. Sanders, Michael Freyberg, Axel Schwope

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates claims of faint nebular X-ray emission around PSR B0656+14, demonstrating that previous detections are likely artifacts of PSF modeling issues and that the diffuse emission is consistent with the pulsar's own spectrum.
Contribution
It provides a cautious reanalysis of eROSITA data, showing that the extended emission is not reliably detected and is consistent with the pulsar's emission, challenging prior claims of a nebular or halo origin.
Findings
The PSF model underestimates emission beyond 1'
Diffuse X-ray emission matches the pulsar's spectral model
No reliable detection of faint nebular emission
Abstract
We present a cautionary assessment of the extended X-ray emission around PSR B0656+14 in eROSITA Cal-PV data in response to the work of Niu et al. 2025 (arXiv:2501.17046). The eROSITA PSF model is known to underestimate emission in the wings beyond 1'. This prevents a reliable detection of faint nebular emission around PSR B0656+14 as claimed in arXiv:2501.17046. In addition, spectral analysis shows the surrounding diffuse X-rays can be fitted with the same 2BB+PL model as the pulsar's emission itself. This strongly invalidates the interpretation by the authors of arXiv:2501.17046 that the X-ray emission in the (4-10)' region is associated with the degree-scale gamma-ray halo recently found by the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory (HAWC), and shows that it originates from the pulsar due to the wings of the PSF.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
