Bounded Weighted Edit Distance: Dynamic Algorithms and Matching Lower Bounds

TL;DR

This paper develops a dynamic algorithm for weighted edit distance that efficiently maintains the distance between changing strings, offering a trade-off between preprocessing time and update time, and establishes lower bounds for optimality.

Contribution

It introduces a novel dynamic algorithm for weighted edit distance with a tunable trade-off parameter, extending previous work to handle large weights efficiently.

Findings

Achieves $ ilde{O}(k^{3- heta})$ update time with $ ilde{O}(nk^ heta)$ preprocessing.

Provides conditional lower bounds demonstrating near-optimality of the algorithm.

Extends dynamic maintenance techniques from unweighted to weighted edit distance.

Abstract

The edit distance $ed(X,Y)$ of two strings $X,Y\in \Sigma^*$ is the minimum number of character edits (insertions, deletions, and substitutions) needed to transform $X$ into $Y$. Its weighted counterpart $ed^w(X,Y)$ minimizes the total cost of edits, which are specified using a function $w$, normalized so that each edit costs at least one. The textbook dynamic-programming procedure, given strings $X,Y\in \Sigma^{\le n}$ and oracle access to $w$, computes $ed^w(X,Y)$ in $O(n^2)$ time. Nevertheless, one can achieve better running times if the computed distance, denoted $k$, is small: $O(n+k^2)$ for unit weights [Landau and Vishkin; JCSS'88] and $\tilde{O}(n+\sqrt{nk^3})$ for arbitrary weights [Cassis, Kociumaka, Wellnitz; FOCS'23]. In this paper, we study the dynamic version of the weighted edit distance problem, where the goal is to maintain $ed^w(X,Y)$ for strings $X,Y\in \Sigma^{\le n}$ that change over time, with each update specified as an edit in $X$ or $Y$. Very recently, Gorbachev and Kociumaka [STOC'25] showed that the unweighted distance $ed(X,Y)$ can be maintained in $\tilde{O}(k)$ time per update after $\tilde{O}(n+k^2)$-time preprocessing; here, $k$ denotes the current value of $ed(X,Y)$. Their algorithm generalizes to small integer weights, but the underlying approach is incompatible with large weights. Our main result is a dynamic algorithm that maintains $ed^w(X,Y)$ in $\tilde{O}(k^{3-\gamma})$ time per update after $\tilde{O}(nk^\gamma)$-time preprocessing. Here, $\gamma\in [0,1]$ is a real trade-off parameter and $k\ge 1$ is an integer threshold fixed at preprocessing time, with $\infty$ returned whenever $ed^w(X,Y)>k$. We complement our algorithm with conditional lower bounds showing fine-grained optimality of our trade-off for $\gamma \in [0.5,1)$ and justifying our choice to fix $k$.