Topology-Preserved Auto-regressive Mesh Generation in the Manner of Weaving Silk
Gaochao Song, Zibo Zhao, Haohan Weng, Jingbo Zeng, Rongfei Jia, Shenghua Gao

TL;DR
This paper introduces a topology-aware auto-regressive mesh generation method that preserves geometric properties and improves compression efficiency, addressing limitations of previous approaches that ignored mesh topology.
Contribution
We propose a novel topology-preserving mesh tokenization algorithm with vertex layering, and an online data processing strategy to enhance mesh generation quality and dataset scalability.
Findings
Achieved state-of-the-art compression ratios.
Generated meshes with improved topological integrity.
Enhanced geometric consistency in mesh synthesis.
Abstract
Existing auto-regressive mesh generation approaches suffer from ineffective topology preservation, which is crucial for practical applications. This limitation stems from previous mesh tokenization methods treating meshes as simple collections of equivalent triangles, lacking awareness of the overall topological structure during generation. To address this issue, we propose a novel mesh tokenization algorithm that provides a canonical topological framework through vertex layering and ordering, ensuring critical geometric properties including manifoldness, watertightness, face normal consistency, and part awareness in the generated meshes. Measured by Compression Ratio and Bits-per-face, we also achieved state-of-the-art compression efficiency. Furthermore, we introduce an online non-manifold data processing algorithm and a training resampling strategy to expand the scale of trainable…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
**1、Novel and Elegant Tokenization:** The core contribution—a tokenization scheme based on vertex layering and ordering—is highly novel and intuitive. The "weaving silk" analogy provides an elegant conceptual framework for ensuring local and global mesh consistency, which is a significant departure from prior methods that often treat meshes as an unstructured collection of triangles. **2、Guaranteed Geometric Properties by Design:** This is the most compelling strength of the paper. Instead of r
While the paper presents a compelling framework, several points regarding its efficiency, scalability, and experimental scope warrant further discussion. **1、Unexplored Scalability to Higher Polygon Counts:** The paper does not fully explore whether the proposed method can generalize to higher-polygon meshes, such as those with 10,000 or 20,000 faces. The methodology relies on a Maximum Vertices per Layer limit (m=200) to maintain efficiency. Does an increase in face count necessitate a corresp
I agree that the proposed method achieves the same compression ratio (0.22) as TreeMeshGPT. It also introduces a novel approach to connectivity compression, conceptually similar to sparse matrix compression, which may inspire future research. The preprocessing strategy for handling non-manifold meshes appears reasonable and may also benefit related studies.
The proposed method relies on a fixed layering size M, and meshes exceeding this vertex limit are discarded during training. This constraint prevents the model from generalizing to larger and more complex meshes, and it seems difficult to overcome. The compression ratio, which directly relates to computational resources, remains identical to TreeMeshGPT, showing 0 improvement. Although the new metric Bits-per-Face shows about a 10% improvement, the paper does not explain or demonstrate the pract
The presented tokenization scheme achieves state-of-the-art bits-per-face ratio and compression ratio compared to previous mesh generation tokenization schemes. It is based on a detailed analysis of the structure of real-world mesh datasets. Furthermore, its ability to preserve manifold topology makes it valuable for real-world applications. This is reflected in the highly competitive geometric accuracy and quality scores in the generation experiment. The paper is well written for the most par
My main concerns are w.r.t. the claims of the paper regarding watertightness and manifoldness of the inferred meshes, as well as the influence of the resampling step in the training strategy compared to other compression methods. - The paper makes multiple claims about the properties of the generated meshes that are not obvious, yet are not further explained (e.g. watertightness (Table 1 and L073) or manifoldness (L312)). The autoregressive transformer is not incentivised to always predict a pr
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Materials and Mechanics · Silk-based biomaterials and applications
