Dangerous Questions in Astronomy Education
Michael Fitzgerald, Rachel Freed, Dan Reichart, Kate Meredith, Kalee Tock, Daryl Janzen, Saeed Salimpour, Jennifer Lynn Bartlett, Matthew Beaky, Art Borja, Ken Brandt, Jim Buchholz, Patricia Craig, Anthony Crider, Richard Datwyler, Marta Dark-McNeese, Anna DeJong

TL;DR
This paper synthesizes community perspectives on astronomy education, emphasizing authentic, inclusive, and inquiry-based approaches aligned with modern scientific practices and technological advancements.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive framework of six themes and concrete recommendations for evolving astronomy education to meet contemporary scientific and societal needs.
Findings
Highlighting the importance of authentic inquiry and open-source resources.
Advocating for culturally inclusive and active learning strategies.
Outlining priority areas for astronomy education research.
Abstract
As astronomy enters an era defined by global telescope networks, petabyte-scale surveys, and powerful computational tools, the longstanding goals of astronomy education, particularly introductory ``ASTRO101'', but equally encompassing both higher and lower level courses, warrant fresh examination. In June 2024, the AstroEdUNC meeting at UNC--Chapel Hill convened 100 astronomers, education researchers, and practitioners to synthesise community perspectives on the purpose, content, and delivery of astronomy education. Beginning with historical vignettes, the meeting's deliberations were organised into six interrelated themes: (1) Context, highlighting astronomy's evolution from classical charting to multi-messenger discovery and its role as a connective thread across STEM and the humanities; (2) Content, exploring how curricula can balance essential concepts with authentic investigations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
