Study of $B_{c}(1P)^{+}$ states in the $B_{c}^{+} \gamma$ mass spectrum
LHCb collaboration: R. Aaij, A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb, C. Abellan Beteta, F. Abudin\'en, T. Ackernley, A. A. Adefisoye, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, P. Adlarson, C. Agapopoulou, C.A. Aidala, Z. Ajaltouni, S. Akar, K. Akiba, P. Albicocco, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio, Z. Aliouche

TL;DR
This paper reports the observation of excited $P$-wave $B_c^+$ states in the $B_c^+ o B_c^+ \gamma$ mass spectrum, providing insights into heavy quarkonium spectroscopy and testing quantum chromodynamics predictions.
Contribution
First observation of $B_c(1P)^+$ states in the $B_c^+ o B_c^+ \gamma$ spectrum, with detailed analysis and measurement of production cross-section relative to the ground state.
Findings
Observed a structure consistent with $P$-wave $B_c^+$ states with >7 sigma significance.
Measured the relative production cross-section of $B_c(1P)^+$ states to the ground state as 0.20 ± 0.03 (stat) ± 0.02 (syst) ± 0.03 (model).
Explored various theoretical models to interpret the observed structure.
Abstract
The study of a wide peaking structure in the mass spectrum is reported using a data sample of proton-proton collisions collected by the LHCb detector at center-of-mass energies of , , and , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of . The observed structure is consistent with the lowest excited -wave states and exhibits a statistical significance exceeding seven standard deviations relative to the background-only hypothesis. A two-peak model serves as an effective description of the data, with various theory-constrained models further explored to provide physical interpretation. Based on the predictions for the spectrum, the relative production cross-section of the overall states with respect to the ground state with the transverse momentum and rapidity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
