Testing T2K's Bayesian constraints with priors in alternate parameterisations
The T2K Collaboration: K. Abe, S. Abe, R. Akutsu, H. Alarakia-Charles, Y.I. Alj Hakim, S. Alonso Monsalve, L. Anthony, S. Aoki, K.A. Apte, T. Arai, T. Arihara, S. Arimoto, Y. Ashida, E.T. Atkin, N. Babu, V. Baranov, G.J. Barker, G. Barr, D. Barrow, P. Bates, L. Bathe-Peters

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different prior choices in Bayesian analysis affect the interpretation of T2K neutrino oscillation data, finding that some parameters are robust while others depend on prior assumptions.
Contribution
It explores the impact of alternative parameterisations on Bayesian constraints in neutrino physics, highlighting the robustness and sensitivity of different parameters.
Findings
CP violation constraints are robust across priors
Octant preference depends on the chosen symmetry
Prior choice influences some parameter inferences
Abstract
Bayesian analysis results require a choice of prior distribution. In long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics, the usual parameterisation of the mixing matrix induces a prior that privileges certain neutrino mass and flavour state symmetries. Here we study the effect of privileging alternate symmetries on the results of the T2K experiment. We find that constraints on the level of CP violation (as given by the Jarlskog invariant) are robust under the choices of prior considered in the analysis. On the other hand, the degree of octant preference for the atmospheric angle depends on which symmetry has been privileged.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
