Arbitrage with bounded Liquidity
Christoph Schlegel, Quintus Kilbourn

TL;DR
This paper analyzes arbitrage opportunities between two markets with limited liquidity, deriving the potential gains and losses based on their relative liquidity and trading volumes, considering quadratic trading costs.
Contribution
It extends previous models by accounting for imperfect liquidity in both markets, providing a more realistic assessment of arbitrage gains.
Findings
LVR depends on relative liquidity and trading volume
Arbitrage gains are affected by quadratic trading costs
Model applicable to markets with limited liquidity
Abstract
We derive the arbitrage gains or, equivalently, Loss Versus Rebalancing (LVR) for arbitrage between \textit{two imperfectly liquid} markets, extending prior work that assumes the existence of an infinitely liquid reference market. Our result highlights that the LVR depends on the relative liquidity and relative trading volume of the two markets between which arbitrage gains are extracted. Our model assumes that trading costs on at least one of the markets is quadratic. This assumption holds well in practice, with the exception of highly liquid major pairs on centralized exchanges, for which we discuss extensions to other cost functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
