Ghost in the Machine: Examining the Philosophical Implications of Recursive Algorithms in Artificial Intelligence Systems
Llewellin RG Jegels

TL;DR
This paper explores whether recursive algorithms in AI suggest machine consciousness, concluding that while they improve capabilities, they do not imply subjective experience or moral considerations.
Contribution
It provides a multidisciplinary analysis distinguishing functional self-modeling from consciousness, integrating philosophical, cognitive, and engineering perspectives on AI.
Findings
Recursive self-reference enhances AI capabilities.
Current architectures lack subjective experience.
Phenomenal consciousness remains an unresolved barrier.
Abstract
This paper investigates whether contemporary AI architectures employing deep recursion, meta-learning, and self-referential mechanisms provide evidence of machine consciousness. Integrating philosophical history, cognitive science, and AI engineering, it situates recursive algorithms within a lineage spanning Cartesian dualism, Husserlian intentionality, Integrated Information Theory, the Global Workspace model, and enactivist perspectives. The argument proceeds through textual analysis, comparative architecture review, and synthesis of neuroscience findings on integration and prediction. Methodologically, the study combines conceptual analysis, case studies, and normative risk assessment informed by phenomenology and embodied cognition. Technical examples, including transformer self-attention, meta-cognitive agents, and neuromorphic chips, illustrate how functional self-modeling can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
