The Cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys VII. Bypassing scaling relations with Lagrangian Deep Learning and Simulation-based inference
Nicolas Cerardi, Marguerite Pierre, Fran\c{c}ois Lanusse, Xavier Corap

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel simulation-based deep learning approach to model galaxy cluster counts, bypassing traditional scaling relations, thereby reducing degeneracies and better capturing complex astrophysical processes for cosmological inference.
Contribution
It develops a Lagrangian Deep Learning emulator trained on simulations to directly model cluster counts from astrophysical processes, improving over traditional scaling relation methods.
Findings
Successfully reproduces cluster populations in simulations.
Reduces degeneracy in cosmological parameter inference.
Provides insights into feedback mechanisms in galaxy clusters.
Abstract
Galaxy clusters, the pinnacle of structure formation in our universe, are a powerful cosmological probe. Several approaches have been proposed to express cluster number counts, but all these methods rely on empirical explicit scaling relations that link observed properties to the total cluster mass. These scaling relations are over-parametrised, inducing some degeneracy with cosmology. Moreover, they do not provide a direct handle on the numerous non-gravitational phenomena that affect the physics of the intra-cluster medium. We present a proof-of-concept to model cluster number counts, that bypasses the explicit use of scaling relations. We rather implement the effect of several astrophysical processes to describe the cluster properties. We then evaluate the performances of this modelling for the cosmological inference. We developed an accelerated machine learning baryonic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
