B-PL-PINN: Stabilizing PINN Training with Bayesian Pseudo Labeling
Kevin Innerebner, Franz M. Rohrhofer, Bernhard C. Geiger

TL;DR
This paper introduces B-PL-PINN, a Bayesian approach to stabilize PINN training by replacing ensemble methods with posterior variance evaluation, improving convergence on benchmark problems.
Contribution
It proposes a Bayesian PINN method that replaces ensemble consensus with posterior variance, enhancing training stability and performance.
Findings
Outperforms ensemble methods on benchmark problems
Competitive with combined Adam and LBFGS PINN ensembles
Mathematically principled approach improves convergence
Abstract
Training physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for forward problems often suffers from severe convergence issues, hindering the propagation of information from regions where the desired solution is well-defined. Haitsiukevich and Ilin (2023) proposed an ensemble approach that extends the active training domain of each PINN based on i) ensemble consensus and ii) vicinity to (pseudo-)labeled points, thus ensuring that the information from the initial condition successfully propagates to the interior of the computational domain. In this work, we suggest replacing the ensemble by a Bayesian PINN, and consensus by an evaluation of the PINN's posterior variance. Our experiments show that this mathematically principled approach outperforms the ensemble on a set of benchmark problems and is competitive with PINN ensembles trained with combinations of Adam and LBFGS.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
