Learning to Segment for Vehicle Routing Problems
Wenbin Ouyang, Sirui Li, Yining Ma, Cathy Wu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a neural framework called L2Seg that improves vehicle routing problem solvers by identifying stable solution segments, leading to 2x-7x faster solutions while maintaining accuracy.
Contribution
We propose L2Seg, a novel neural method for segmenting solutions in VRPs, enabling acceleration of iterative heuristics through the FSTA decomposition technique.
Findings
L2Seg accelerates VRP solvers by 2x to 7x.
L2Seg is compatible with various solvers and VRP types.
Synergistic variants of L2Seg outperform individual ones.
Abstract
Iterative heuristics are widely recognized as state-of-the-art for Vehicle Routing Problems (VRPs). In this work, we exploit a critical observation: a large portion of the solution remains stable, i.e., unchanged across search iterations, causing redundant computations, especially for large-scale VRPs with long subtours. To address this, we pioneer the formal study of the First-Segment-Then-Aggregate (FSTA) decomposition technique to accelerate iterative solvers. FSTA preserves stable solution segments during the search, aggregates nodes within each segment into fixed hypernodes, and focuses the search only on unstable portions. Yet, a key challenge lies in identifying which segments should be aggregated. To this end, we introduce Learning-to-Segment (L2Seg), a novel neural framework to intelligently differentiate potentially stable and unstable portions for FSTA decomposition. We…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Oral
(1) The paper is generally well-written and structured. (2) The novel FSTA framework and the specific problem of learning to segment for decomposition are a fresh perspective. (3) The FSTA framework is well-motivated, and its theoretical properties (feasibility and monotonicity) are formally proven for multiple VRP variants. (4) Experiments are comprehensive, testing on large-scale problems, multiple backbone solvers (classic, neural, hybrid), and various VRP types, demonstrating robust perf
1. While the paper demonstrates broad applicability, a more explicit discussion of the boundaries of FSTA/L2Seg's effectiveness would be beneficial. For example, under what conditions (e.g., problem size, structure, solver type) might the overhead of segmentation and aggregation outweigh the benefits? 2. It is unclear that the boundary of the acceleration, as I notice that the HGS and LKH3 only run for a short time (5m and 10m). If the solving time extends, how will the acceleration benefit chan
1. The paper's proposed method of learning to identify and freeze stable segments to accelerate iterative search is intuitive and novel. The proposed method is promising and achieves SOTA performance on most of the testing cases. 2. The FSTA framework is technically sound and empirically robust. It is formalized, and the authors provide theoretical proofs of its feasibility and monotonicity across various VRP variants (CVRP, VRPTW, VRPB, etc.). 3. The authors tested L2Seg on three different and
1. The L2Seg-SYN process seems a bit complicated. It is unclear how much time is consumed by the L2Seg-SYN prediction step. If the L2Seg-SYN prediction step itself is costly, the 2x-7x speedup may only be noticeable over long runs. 2. While L2Seg has been successfully applied to LKH-3, LNS, and L2D, Appendix B.1.4 mentions that applying it to HGS (another top-level solver) requires modifying the HGS source code, which is left for future work. This is a reasonable limitation, but it means that L2
- The empirical study is well executed, covering multiple VRP variants, backbone solvers, and problem scales (1k–5k). Ablation studies, oracle comparisons, and visual analyses provide convincing evidence that the proposed framework accelerates iterative search. - The proposed framework is well documented, including pseudocode and architectural details. The authors have made strong efforts to ensure reproducibility and practical relevance.
- Limited conceptual novelty: the proposed framework can be viewed as a natural neural extension of existing decomposition-based heuristics. While the idea of stability is interesting, the framework essentially replaces a search space of LNS. - Restricted theoretical contribution: the theoretical analysis is limited to the monotonicity of the FSTA reduction — that improving a reduced problem implies improving the original one. However, the paper lacks theoretical analysis regarding solution qual
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVehicle Routing Optimization Methods · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
