On the (In)Approximability of the Monitoring Edge Geodetic Set Problem
Davide Bil\`o, Giordano Colli, Luca Forlizzi, Stefano Leucci

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational difficulty of approximating the Monitoring Edge Geodetic Set problem, establishing inapproximability bounds, hardness results, and providing approximation algorithms for specific graph classes.
Contribution
It proves an log n inapproximability bound for the problem, strengthens NP-hardness results on 1-apex graphs, and offers new approximation algorithms for planar, bounded genus, and bounded treewidth graphs.
Findings
No polynomial-time approximation within log n unless P=NP.
NP-hardness extends to 1-apex graphs.
Approximation algorithms with ratios O(n^{1/4} log n) for planar and related graphs.
Abstract
We study the minimum \emph{Monitoring Edge Geodetic Set} (\megset) problem introduced in [Foucaud et al., CALDAM'23]: given a graph , we say that an edge is monitored by a pair of vertices if \emph{all} shortest paths between and traverse ; the goal of the problem consists in finding a subset of vertices of such that each edge of is monitored by at least one pair of vertices in , and is minimized. In this paper, we prove that all polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the minimum \megset problem must have an approximation ratio of , unless \p = \np. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-constant inapproximability result known for this problem. We also strengthen the known \np-hardness of the problem on -apex graphs by showing that the same result holds for -apex graphs. This leaves open the problem of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
