Forecast for growth-rate measurement using peculiar velocities from LSST supernovae
Damiano Rosselli, Bastien Carreres, Corentin Ravoux, Julian E. Bautista, Dominique Fouchez, Alex G. Kim, Benjamin Racine, Fabrice Feinstein, Bruno S\'anchez, Aurelien Valade, The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration

TL;DR
This paper assesses LSST supernovae's potential to measure the cosmic growth rate using peculiar velocities, demonstrating that with realistic conditions, it can achieve about 10-18% precision in a specific redshift range, aiding cosmological tests.
Contribution
It introduces a maximum-likelihood method to estimate the growth-rate parameter from LSST supernova peculiar velocities, accounting for observational noise and contamination, and evaluates its accuracy under various scenarios.
Findings
LSST can measure $f\sigma_8$ with 10% precision between redshifts 0.02 and 0.14.
Using three tomographic bins, the growth rate can be constrained with errors below 18%.
Contamination below 2% does not bias the growth-rate measurement.
Abstract
In this work, we investigate the feasibility of measuring the cosmic growth-rate parameter, , using peculiar velocities (PVs) derived from Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) in the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We produce simulations of different SN types using a realistic LSST observing strategy, incorporating noise, photometric detection from the Difference Image Analysis (DIA) pipeline, and a PV field modeled from the Uchuu UniverseMachine simulations. We test three observational scenarios, ranging from ideal conditions with spectroscopic host-galaxy redshifts and spectroscopic SN classification, to more realistic settings involving photometric classification and contamination from non-Ia supernovae. Using a maximum-likelihood technique, we show that LSST can measure with a precision of in the redshift range $ 0.02 < z <…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
