Facets of Brachistochronic Trajectories
David Agmon, Ady Mann

TL;DR
This paper explores brachistochrone trajectories by establishing rules for conservative and central forces, enabling direct solution of motion equations through magnetic field replacement instead of traditional Euler-Lagrange methods.
Contribution
It introduces four rules as sufficient conditions for brachistochrone trajectories, including a novel approach using magnetic fields to replace wire constraints for direct integration.
Findings
Four rules for brachistochrone trajectories are formulated.
Magnetic fields can replace wire constraints in trajectory analysis.
Direct integration methods are enabled for solving motion equations.
Abstract
This paper studies brachistochrone trajectories. Four rules are formulated as sufficient conditions. Two rules apply for a general conservative force. Two rules apply for a central force. A central force allows wire replacement. The wire is replaced by appropriate magnetic field. This enables solving motion equations directly. We replace Euler Lagrange with direct integration.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics · Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
