What Prevents Resolving the Hubble Tension through Late-Time Expansion Modifications?
Zhihuan Zhou, Zhuang Miao, Sheng Bi, Chaoqian Ai, Hongchao Zhang

TL;DR
This paper shows that Type Ia supernovae observations critically limit the ability of late-time expansion modifications to fully resolve the Hubble tension, with current data constraining the maximum achievable H0 to about 69.
Contribution
It demonstrates that SNe Ia data impose fundamental constraints on late-time expansion models aimed at resolving the Hubble tension, highlighting a key obstacle.
Findings
Late-time $w(z)$ deformations can reconcile some data tensions.
No viable solutions with $H_0 > 69$ satisfy SNe Ia constraints.
Maximum achievable $H_0$ is about 69.09 with current data.
Abstract
We demonstrate that Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) observations impose the critical constraint for resolving the Hubble tension through late-time expansion modifications. Applying the Fisher-bias optimization framework to cosmic chronometers (CC), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from DESI DR2, Planck CMB, and Pantheon+ data, we find that: (i) deformations in (via reconstruction) can reconcile tensions between CC, Planck, DESI BAO, and SH0ES measurements while maintaining or improving fit quality ( relative to CDM); (ii) In the neighborhood of Planck best-fit CDM model, no cosmologically viable solutions targeting satisfy SNe Ia constraints. MCMC validation confirms the maximum achievable () across all data combinations, indicating that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
