From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows
Mohamed Amine Ferrag, Norbert Tihanyi, Djallel Hamouda, Leandros Maglaras, Abderrahmane Lakas, Merouane Debbah

TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive threat model for LLM-powered AI agents, categorizing over thirty attack techniques and proposing mitigation strategies to enhance security in complex, multi-agent workflows.
Contribution
It introduces the first integrated taxonomy linking input exploits and protocol vulnerabilities in LLM-agent ecosystems, with formal threat formulations and mitigation guidance.
Findings
Identified over thirty attack techniques across different system layers.
Validated the threat model through expert review and real-world incident mapping.
Reviewed existing defenses and proposed mitigation strategies.
Abstract
Autonomous AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) with structured function-calling interfaces enable real-time data retrieval, computation, and multi-step orchestration. However, the rapid growth of plugins, connectors, and inter-agent protocols has outpaced security practices, leading to brittle integrations that rely on ad-hoc authentication, inconsistent schemas, and weak validation. This survey introduces a unified end-to-end threat model for LLM-agent ecosystems, covering host-to-tool and agent-to-agent communications. We systematically categorize more than thirty attack techniques spanning input manipulation, model compromise, system and privacy attacks, and protocol-level vulnerabilities. For each category, we provide a formal threat formulation defining attacker capabilities, objectives, and affected system layers. Representative examples include Prompt-to-SQL…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
