Model-theoretic Forcing in Transition Algebra
Go Hashimoto, Daniel G\u{a}in\u{a}

TL;DR
This paper introduces a forcing technique for a complex many-sorted logic called Transition Algebra, proving key theorems despite its high expressivity and non-compactness, and extends proof systems for finite models.
Contribution
It develops a generalized forcing method for Transition Algebra, establishing L"owenheim-Skolem and Omitting Types theorems in a non-compact setting, and extends proof rules for finite transition models.
Findings
Established a forcing technique for Transition Algebra.
Proved L"owenheim-Skolem and Omitting Types theorems in this logic.
Extended proof systems to finite and constructor-based transition algebras.
Abstract
We study L\"owenheim-Skolem and Omitting Types theorems in Transition Algebra, a logical system obtained by enhancing many sorted first-order logic with features from dynamic logic. The sentences we consider include compositions, unions, and transitive closures of transition relations, which are treated similarly to actions in dynamic logics to define necessity and possibility operators. We show that Upward L\"owenheim-Skolem theorem, any form of compactness, and joint Robinson consistency property fail due to the expressivity of transitive closures of transitions. In this non-compact many-sorted logical system, we develop a forcing technique method by generalizing the classical method of forcing used by Keisler to prove Omitting Types theorem. Instead of working within a single signature, we work with a directed diagram of signatures, which allows us to establish Downward…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
