Two-Stage Stochastic Capacity Expansion in Stable Matching under Truthful or Strategic Preference Uncertainty

TL;DR

This paper models a two-stage stochastic matching problem considering uncertain preferences, analyzing capacity expansion and strategic preference reporting, with applications to school choice and admission strategies.

Contribution

It introduces a novel two-stage stochastic framework for capacity planning under preference uncertainty, incorporating strategic behavior and proposing heuristics for complex problem solving.

Findings

SAA-based methods outperform scenario averaging in matching outcomes

Student strategic behavior significantly impacts capacity decisions

Preference uncertainty affects capacity expansion strategies

Abstract

Recent studies on many-to-one matching markets have explored agents with flexible capacity and truthful preference reporting, focusing on mechanisms that jointly design capacities and select a matching. However, in real-world applications such as school choice and residency matching, preferences are revealed after capacity decisions are made, with matching occurring afterward; uncertainty about agents' preferences must be considered during capacity planning. Moreover, even under strategy-proof mechanisms, agents may strategically misreport preferences based on beliefs about admission chances. We introduce a two-stage stochastic matching problem with uncertain preferences, using school choice as a case study. In the first stage, the clearinghouse expands schools' capacities before observing students' reported preferences. Students either report their true preferences, producing exogenous uncertainty, or act strategically, submitting reported preferences based on their true preferences and admission chances (which depend on capacities), introducing endogenous uncertainty. In the second stage, the clearinghouse computes the student-optimal stable matching based on schools' priorities and students' reported preferences. In strategic cases, endogenous reported preferences are utility-maximizing transformations of capacity decisions and exogenous true preferences; we handle uncertainty using sample average approximation(SAA). We develop behavior-based mathematical formulations and, due to problem complexity, propose Lagrangian- and local-search-based behavior-specific heuristics for near-optimal solutions. Our SAA-based approaches outperform the average scenario approach on students' matching preferences and admission outcomes, emphasizing the impact of stochastic preferences on capacity decisions. Student behavior notably influences capacity design, stressing the need to consider misreports.