Long-range systems, (non)extensivity, and the rescaling of energies
Michael Kastner

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the physical meaning of the Kac prescription used to make long-range interacting systems extensive by analyzing scaling arguments for finite and infinite systems.
Contribution
It provides a clear physical interpretation of the Kac prescription, addressing its justification and implications in long-range systems.
Findings
Kac prescription rescales interactions to achieve extensivity
Physical interpretation differs between finite and infinite systems
Clarifies common confusions about energy scaling in long-range systems
Abstract
Systems with long-range interactions have seen a surge of interest in the past decades. In the wake of this surge, the use of a system size dependent rescaling, sometimes termed "Kac prescription," of the long-range pair potential has seen widespread use. This ad hoc modification of the Hamiltonian makes the energy extensive, but its physical justification and implications are a frequent source of confusion and misinterpretation. After all, in real physical -body systems, the pair interaction strength does not scale with the number of constituents. This article presents, at an introductory level, scaling arguments that provide a clear physical interpretation of the "Kac prescription" for finite systems as well as in the thermodynamic limit.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
