Distinguishing Siegel modular forms
Arvind Kumar, Ariel Weiss

TL;DR
This paper extends the strong multiplicity one theorem for genus 2 Siegel modular forms, showing that polynomial relations among Hecke eigenvalues imply the forms are related by a twist, and applies similar ideas to elliptic forms.
Contribution
It generalizes the strong multiplicity one theorem to arbitrary polynomial relations among Hecke eigenvalues for Siegel and elliptic modular forms, using Galois representation analysis.
Findings
Polynomial relations among Hecke eigenvalues imply forms are twists of each other.
The image of the product Galois representation is maximal unless forms are twists.
Unified method for distinguishing elliptic and Siegel modular forms based on Hecke data.
Abstract
Let and be genus cuspidal Siegel paramodular newforms. We prove that if their Hecke eigenvalues and satisfy a non-trivial polynomial relation for a set of primes of positive density, then is a scalar multiple of a quadratic twist of . This result extends the strong multiplicity one theorem, which handles the case , to arbitrary polynomial relations. Our proof analyses the image of the product Galois representation attached to the pair : we show that this image is as large as possible, unless is a twist of . Our results also apply to elliptic modular forms. They therefore provide a unified method for distinguishing both elliptic and Siegel modular forms based on their Hecke data, including their Hecke eigenvalues, Satake parameters, Sato--Tate angles, and the coefficients of their -functions.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research
