Interactive Multi-Objective Probabilistic Preference Learning with Soft and Hard Bounds
Edward Chen, Sang T. Truong, Natalie Dullerud, Sanmi Koyejo, Carlos Guestrin

TL;DR
This paper introduces Active-MoSH, an interactive framework combining probabilistic preference learning and sensitivity analysis to efficiently identify Pareto-optimal solutions in high-stakes, multi-objective decision-making scenarios, enhancing user trust and decision quality.
Contribution
It presents a novel interactive framework, Active-MoSH, that systematically refines preferences and explores solutions using soft-hard bounds, probabilistic modeling, and sensitivity analysis, improving decision support in complex tasks.
Findings
Active-MoSH improves convergence to preferred solutions.
The framework increases decision-maker trust.
User study confirms enhanced decision quality and trust.
Abstract
High-stakes decision-making involves navigating multiple competing objectives with expensive evaluations. For instance, in brachytherapy, clinicians must balance maximizing tumor coverage (e.g., an aspirational target or soft bound of >95% coverage) against strict organ dose limits (e.g., a non-negotiable hard bound of <601 cGy to the bladder), with each plan evaluation being resource-intensive. Selecting Pareto-optimal solutions that match implicit preferences is challenging, as exhaustive Pareto frontier exploration is computationally and cognitively prohibitive, necessitating interactive frameworks to guide users. While decision-makers (DMs) often possess domain knowledge to narrow the search via such soft-hard bounds, current methods often lack systematic approaches to iteratively refine these multi-faceted preference structures. Critically, DMs must trust their final decision,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
