Glitches far from transient gravitational-wave events do not bias inference
Sophie Hourihane, Katerina Chatziioannou

TL;DR
This study shows that glitches outside the time-frequency region of gravitational-wave signals and with low signal-to-noise ratios do not bias parameter inference, potentially reducing the need for mitigation efforts.
Contribution
The paper identifies conditions under which glitch mitigation is unnecessary, specifically when glitches are outside the signal's time-frequency space and have SNR below 50.
Findings
Glitches outside the signal's time-frequency space do not bias parameter estimation.
Glitches with SNR below 50 do not impact gravitational-wave signal inference.
Mitigation efforts can be reduced under certain glitch conditions.
Abstract
Non-Gaussian noise in gravitational-wave detectors, known as "glitches," can bias the inferred parameters of transient signals when they occur nearby in time and frequency. These biases are addressed with a variety of methods that remove or otherwise mitigate the impact of the glitch. Given the computational cost and human effort required for glitch mitigation, we study the conditions under which it is strictly necessary. We consider simulated glitches and gravitational-wave signals in various configurations that probe their proximity both in time and in frequency. We determine that glitches located outside the time-frequency space spanned by the gravitational-wave model prior and with a signal-to-noise ratio, conservatively, below 50 do not impact estimation of the signal parameters.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
