Optical Strong Line Ratios Cannot Distinguish Between Stellar Populations and Accreting Black Holes at High Ionization Parameters and Low Metallicities
Nikko J. Cleri, Grace M. Olivier, Bren E. Backhaus, Joel Leja, Casey Papovich, Jonathan R. Trump, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Veronique Buat, Denis Burgarella, Emilie Burnham, Antonello Calabro, Jonathan H. Cohn, Justin W. Cole, Kelcey Davis, Mark Dickinson, Steven L. Finkelstein

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that optical strong line ratios at high redshift are ineffective for distinguishing between stellar and black hole ionizing sources due to their dependence on ionization parameters and metallicity, leading to degeneracies.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis showing the limitations of traditional optical diagnostics at high redshift and suggests that high-ionization emission lines can help resolve source degeneracies.
Findings
Optical line ratios are heavily influenced by ionization parameter and metallicity.
High ionization lines (>54 eV) can break degeneracies in source identification.
Traditional diagnostics are unreliable at high redshift due to overlapping model predictions.
Abstract
High-redshift observations from JWST indicate that optical strong line ratios do not carry the same constraining power as they do at low redshifts. Critically, this prevents a separation between stellar- and black hole-driven ionizing radiation, thereby obscuring both active galactic nuclei demographics and star formation rates. To investigate this, we compute a large suite of photoionization models from Cloudy powered by stellar populations and accreting black holes over a large grid of ages, metallicities, initial mass functions, binarity, ionization parameters, densities, and black hole masses. We use these models to test three rest-frame optical strong line ratio diagnostics which have been designed to separate ionizing sources at low redshifts: the [NII]-BPT, VO87, and OHNO diagrams. We show that the position of a model in these diagrams is strongly driven by the ionization…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
