Counterfactual Segmentation Reasoning: Diagnosing and Mitigating Pixel-Grounding Hallucination
Xinzhuo Li, Adheesh Juvekar, Jiaxun Zhang, Xingyou Liu, Muntasir Wahed, Kiet A. Nguyen, Yifan Shen, Tianjiao Yu, Ismini Lourentzou

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new benchmark and method for diagnosing and reducing hallucinations in segmentation vision-language models through counterfactual reasoning and fine-tuning.
Contribution
It formalizes the task of Counterfactual Segmentation Reasoning, creates the HalluSegBench benchmark, and proposes RobustSeg with counterfactual fine-tuning to mitigate hallucinations.
Findings
RobustSeg reduces hallucinations by 30%.
HalluSegBench enables diagnosis of vision-driven hallucinations.
Counterfactual fine-tuning improves segmentation performance.
Abstract
Segmentation Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly advanced grounded visual understanding, yet they remain prone to pixel-grounding hallucinations, producing masks for incorrect objects or for objects that are entirely absent. Existing evaluations rely almost entirely on text- or label-based perturbations, which check only whether the predicted mask matches the queried label. Such evaluations overlook the spatial footprint and severity of hallucination and therefore fail to reveal vision-driven hallucinations, which are more challenging and more prevalent. To address this gap, we formalize the task of Counterfactual Segmentation Reasoning (CSR), where a model must segment the referenced object in the factual image and abstain in its counterfactual counterpart. To support this task, we curate HalluSegBench, the first large-scale benchmark to diagnose referring and reasoning…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
